DISCLAIMER NOTICE: ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT...

Keith Andrew Anderson

Last Updated: February 6th, 2025
Jail Location
Florida
63yo
White Male
5′ 11″ (1.80m)
204lbs (93kg)

Personal Details

Date of birth: Sep 18, 1961
Hair: Unknown or completely bald
Eyes: Blue
Probable cause affidavit: SUBMITTED BY: EMRICK, AL 0104 (AR12-367) THE DEFENDANT DID VIOLATE THE TERMS OF HIS PROBATION IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE NUMBER 948.06, TO WIT: THE DEFENDANT DID COMMIT NEW LAW VIOLATIONS OF PETIT THEFT AND DISORDERLY INTOXICATION IN A PUBLIC PLACE. DID UNLAWFULLY AND KNOWINGLY OBTAIN OR USE, OR ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN OR USE THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM, INVERNESS WAL-MART,      WITH THE INTENT TO EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE THE VICTIM OF A RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFIT THEREOF, OR DID APPROPRIATE THE SAID PROPERTY TO HIS OWN USE OR THE USE OF ANY PERSON NOT ENTITLED THERETO, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE, 812.014(3)(a). \tdid commit certain acts which are of such a nature as to corrupt the public morals or outrage the sense of public decency or affect the peace and quiet of a person who may witness them, or did engage in brawling or fighting, or in such conduct as to constitute a breach of the peace or disorderly conduct, in violation of Florida Statute 877.03. ON 031912 AT 1212 HOURS I WAS DISPATCHED TO THE INVERNESS WAL-MART IN REFERENCE TO A DISTURBANCE CONCERNING AN INTOXICATED PERSON. UPON ARRIVAL I MADE CONTACT WITH THE WAL-MART MANAGER, AT WHICH TIME WE UNSUCCESSFULLY ATTEMPTED TO LOCATE THE DISRUPTIVE PERSON. AT APPROXIMATELY 1247 HOURS, WAL-MART CALLED BACK AND ADVISED THAT THE DISRUPTIVE PERSON WAS STILL THERE AND CAUSING MORE DISRUPTION. THE MANAGER AND I THEN LOCATED THE SUBJECT, LATER IDENTIFIED AS THE DEFENDANT, KEITH ANDERSON, WALKING FROM THE BEER AREA DOWN THE MAIN AISLE HEADED TOWARD THE EXIT. HE WAS CARRYING A FOUR PACK OF ICE HOUSE BEER, A CONTAINER OF BROCCOLI SALAD AND A BUCKET OF CHICKEN. I ADVISED HIM THAT WAL-MART DID NOT WISH TO DO BUSINESS WITH HIM AND HE NEEDED TO LEAVE THE PREMISE. HE INITIALLY AGREED BUT THEN STATED THAT HE HAD MONEY TO PURCHASE THE FOOD. IT WAS THEN AGREED THAT THE DEFENDANT COULD PURCHASE THE FOOD BUT NOT THE ALCOHOL. THE DEFENDANT RESPONDED TO THE WAL-MART CHECK OUT AREA. AFTER RETURNING THE BEER TO THE MANAGER, I WENT TO THE CHECK OUT AREA TO FOLLOW UP AND SEE THAT THE DEFENDANT PAID FOR THE FOOD. AT THAT TIME ANOTHER WAL-MART EMPLOYEE DIRECTED ME OUTSIDE AND ADVISED THE DEFENDANT HAD LEFT THE STORE. AS I WALKED TOWARD THE GARDEN CENTER, TWO WAL-MART EMPLOYEES DIRECTED ME TO AN AREA WHERE THEY HAD OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT URINATING ON PLASTIC TABLES USED IN THE GARDEN CENTER. AS I TURNED THE CORNER I OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT BUTTONING HIS SHORTS WITH WHAT APPEARED TO BE A PUDDLE AT HIS FEET. I ASKED HIM WHAT WAS GOING ON AND HE STATED THAT HE WAS SIMPLY CHANGING HIS CLOTHES. I ASKED HIM WHERE HE GOT THE CLOTHES AND HE ADVISED HE HAD PURCHASED THEM. I THEN ASKED FOR THE RECEIPT AND HE ADVISED THAT HE MUST HAVE THROWN IT AWAY. I ASKED HIM WHERE HE PURCHASED THE CLOTHING AND HE SAID THE HOMOSASSA WAL-MART. I THEN REMINDED THE DEFENDANT AT APPROXIMATELY 1000 HOURS, DEPUTY SLINGERLAND (0443) HAD MADE CONTACT WITH HIM IN INVERNESS. I QUESTIONED HIM HOW HE GOT TO INVERNESS AND HOMOSASSA AND BACK TO THE INVERNESS WAL-MART IN SUCH A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME WITH NO ACCESS TO A VEHICLE. THE DEFENDANT THEN CHANGED HIS STORY AND ADVISED HE HAD PURCHASED THE CLOTHING AT THE INVERNESS WAL-MART. I AGAIN ASKED HIM FOR A RECEIPT AND HE STATED HE MUST HAVE THROWN IT AWAY. I ASKED HIM WHERE THE FOOD WAS THAT HE WAS GOING TO PURCHASE, WHERE HE STATED THAT HE ATE SOME OF THE CHICKEN AND THEN LEFT THE STORE WITHOUT PAYING FOR THE FOOD. AT THAT TIME I ADVISED THE DEFENDANT I WAS PLACING HIM UNDER ARREST FOR PETIT THEFT AND DISORDERLY INTOXICATION. THE DEFENDANT WAS THEN HANDCUFFED (DOUBLE LOCKED) BEHIND HIS BACK AND TRANSPORTED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY. CONTACT WAS MADE WITH THE DEFENDANT’S PROBATION OFFICER CZERWINSKY OF STATE PROBATION AND PAROLE. HE ADVISED THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS ON FELONY PROBATION REFERENCE CASE 2012- CF-148 AND IT WAS A VIOLATION OF HIS PROBATION TO COMMIT A NEW CRIMINAL VIOLATION. THE DEFENDANT’S BOND WAS SET AT PER THE VIOLATION OF PROBATION CHARGE AND $750.00 FOR THE REMAINING CHARGES.
Inmate name: KEITH A ANDERSON
Inmate status: Felony Misdemeanor County/Municipal Traffic Ordinance Warrant/Capias
Initial receipt date: Apr 18, 2012
Facility: TAYLOR C.I.
DC number: 486011
Current custody: MEDIUM

Documented Aliases

KEITH ANDERSON
KEITH A ANDERSON
KEITH A. ANDERSON
KEITH ANDREW ANDERSON

Known addresses

159, Florida 34428
Florida 34429

Recent Arrests

Arrest number: 367
Arrest date: Mar 19, 2012
Arrest type: Felony
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Arrest date: Feb 7, 2012
Booking number: 12124720
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Release date: May 1, 2013
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Recent Charges

Sentence length: 1Y 3M 0D
Discharge date: Apr 2, 2012
Offense date: Jan 27, 2012
Offense: TRAFFIC IN STOLEN PROPERTY
County: CITRUS
Case number: 1200148

Code: 948.06 F
Charge description: Violation of Probation or Community Control (Felony)
Bond amount: $0

Code: 856.011
Charge description: DISORDERLY INTOXICATION IN PUBLIC OR ENDANGER ANOTHER WHILE
Bond amount: $250

Code: 812.014(3)(A)
Charge description: PETIT THEFT
Bond amount: $250

Code: 812.019(1)
Charge description: TRAFFIC OR ENDEAVOR TO TRAFFIC IN STOLEN PROPERTY
Bond amount: $5,000

ACTIVELY MONITORING...

Disclaimer:
Information available through Rain-Street.com is provided for informational purposes only. All records are subject to change and, while every effort is made to ensure the information available is current and accurate, it may contain errors. No guarantee can be made with regard to the accuracy, currency, completeness or usefulness of any information available through this website.

Records published on this website are in no way an indication of guilt or evidence that a crime was committed. Every person mentioned on this website is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Arrest and other court records do not imply guilt. Criminal charges are only formal allegations. For complete case records, contact the relevant law enforcement or judicial agency.