| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: GENTILE, JOSEPH 1362 (AR16-21297) DID UNLAWFULLY RESIST, OBSTRUCT OR OPPOSE DEPUTY GENTILE (1362), WHO WAS THEN AND THERE IN THE LAWFUL EXECUTION OF A LEGAL DUTY, OR EXECUTION OF LEGAL PROCESS, TO WIT: THE DEFENDANT REFUSED TO IDENTIFY HERSELF, WITHOUT OFFERING OR DOING VIOLENCE TO THE PERSON OF SUCH OFFICER, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 843.02. ON 101316, AT APPROXIMATELY 1643 HOURS, I ARRIVED AT 3156 NORTH HOOTY POINT, IN INVERNESS, IN REFERENCE TO A TRESPASS THAT HAD ALREADY OCCURRED. UPON ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH THE COMPLAINANT, MS CLAIRE BARTLETT, WHO ADVISED THAT SHE HAS BEEN HAVING AN ISSUE WITH PEOPLE BEING ON HER PROPERTY AND SHE WOULD LIKE THE SUBJECTS TRESPASSED. THE COMPLAINANT ADVISED THERE WAS TWO WHITE FEMALES AND ONE WHITE MALE; ONE FEMALE HAD LONG DARK HAIR, WAS APPROXIMATELY 5â4, AND WEARING MULTI-COLORED PANTS AND A BLUE SHIRT WITH NO SLEEVES, THE OTHER FEMALE WAS WEARING A WHITE TANK TOP WITH RED PANTS, AND THE MALE SUBJECT WAS OLDER, WEARING NO SHIRT, AND HAD WHITE LONG HAIR AND A BEARD. I WAS ABLE TO OBSERVE THE THREE SUSPECTS A COUPLE RESIDENCES DOWN FROM THE COMPLAINANTâS RESIDENCE AS I ARRIVED ON SCENE. I THEN MADE CONTACT WITH THE THREE SUBJECTS, AT WHICH TIME THE FEMALE WITH THE MULTI-COLORED PANTS AND THE MALE SUBJECT COOPERATED AND PROVIDED THEIR INFORMATION. I ADVISED THEM THAT THEY WERE TRESPASSED FROM THE COMPLAINANTâS PROPERTY. I THEN MADE CONTACT WITH THE DEFENDANT AND ADVISED HER THAT THE COMPLAINANT ALSO WANTED HER TRESPASSED FROM HER PROPERTY. THE DEFENDANT THEN BECAME VERY DEFENSIVE AND STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT ON THE COMPLAINANTâS PROPERTY AT THAT TIME; THEREFORE, HOW COULD SHE BE TRESPASSED. I INFORMED THE DEFENDANT THAT SHE DID NOT PHYSICALLY HAVE TO BE ON THE PROPERTY TO BE TRESPASSED. I INFORMED THE DEFENDANT THAT I NEEDED HER INFORMATION SO THAT I COULD COMPLETE THE TRESPASS FORM FROM THE COMPLAINANTâS PROPERTY. AT THAT TIME, THE DEFENDANT STATED SHE DID NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE PROVIDING ME WITH HER INFORMATION. I ADVISED THE DEFENDANT THAT IF SHE DID NOT PROVIDE ME WITH HER INFORMATION THAT SHE WOULD BE ARRESTED FOR OBSTRUCTION. THE DEFENDANT STATED THAT SHE DID NOT CARE AND ADVISED I COULD TAKE HER TO JAIL. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT SEVERAL MORE TIMES TO PROVIDE ME WITH HER NAME, DATE OF BIRTH, AND ADDRESS SO THAT I COULD COMPLETE THE TRESPASS FORM. I ADVISED HER THAT IF SHE CONTINUED TO NOT COOPERATE THAT I WOULD TAKE HER TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY FOR OBSTRUCTION. THE DEFENDANT THEN ASKED, âAM I BEING ARRESTED?â I AGAIN ADVISED THE DEFENDANT THAT IF SHE DID NOT PROVIDE HER INFORMATION THAT SHE WOULD BE ARRESTED FOR OBSTRUCTION. THE DEFENDANT THEN PROCEEDED TO WALK AWAY. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT ONCE AGAIN IF SHE WOULD PROVIDE ME WITH HER INFORMATION, AT WHICH TIME SHE ADVISED THAT SHE PROVIDED ME WITH THE INFORMATION THAT I NEEDED AND SHE WOULD NOT PROVIDE ME ANY MORE INFORMATION. AT THAT TIME, I ADVISED THE DEFENDANT TO PLACE HER HANDS BEHIND HER BACK AND SHE WAS BEING PLACED UNDER ARREST FOR OBSTRUCTING MY INVESTIGATION. THE DEFENDANT WAS HANDCUFFED (DOUBLE LOCKED) BEHIND HER BACK, PATTED DOWN FOR HER SAFETY AND MINE, SECURED IN THE REAR SEAT OF MY PATROL VEHICLE, AND TRANSPORTED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY. UPON ARRIVAL TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, THE DEFENDANT WAS TURNED OVER TO DETENTION FACILITY STAFF. DUE TO THE DEFENDANT NOT COOPERATING, AT THIS TIME SHE IS LISTED AS JANE DOE, WITH NO BOND PER THE BOND SCHEDULE. |
