| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: HAY, IAN 0641 (AR09110740) UNLAWFULLY ENTER OR REMAIN IN A CERTAIN DWELLING OR CURTILAGE THEREOF, TO-WIT: THE VICTIMS' RESIDENCE, LOCATED IN THE COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAID, THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIMS, WITHOUT SAID PERSON'S CONSENT, WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THEREIN, TO-WIT: BATTERY, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE 810.02(2)(A) ON 083009 AT 1426 HOURS, I WAS DISPATCHED TO A RESIDENCE ON WEST CHERRYWOOD STREET IN CRYSTAL RIVER IN REFERENCE TO A BATTERY THAT HAD ALREADY OCCURRED. INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CALLER THAT THE DEFENDANT, IDENTIFIED AS MS CASEY LYN BOICE, HAD BURST INTO THEIR HOME AND BATTERED BOTH VICTIM ONE AND VICTIM TWO AND THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD FLED THE AREA. UPON ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH VICTIM ONE WHO TOLD ME THAT PRIOR TO THEM CONTACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT, HE HAD RECEIVED A CALL ON HIS CELL PHONE WHICH HIS GIRLFRIEND/VICTIM TWO HAD ANSWERED. VICTIM TWO TOLD ME THAT THE PERSON CALLING WAS THE DEFENDANT AND THAT SHE AND THE DEFENDANT HAD GOTTEN INTO A VERBAL ARGUMENT OVER THE RELATIONSHIP OF VICTIM TWO WITH VICTIM ONE. THE DEFENDANT TOLD VICTIM TWO THAT SHE WAS ON HER WAY OVER TO "BEAT YOUR ASS." VICTIM TWO STATED SHE HUNG UP THE PHONE AND SHE AND VICTIM ONE WENT ABOUT THEIR BUSINESS. VICTIM TWO STATED A SHORT TIME LATER, THE DEFENDANT BURST IN THROUGH THE UNLOCKED FRONT DOOR AND "GOT UP IN MY FACE." VICTIM TWO STATED SHE KNEW THE DEFENDANT WAS NINE MONTHS PREGNANT SO SHE GOT UP FROM THE TABLE WHERE SHE WAS SITTING AND THE DEFENDANT PUSHED HER BACKWARD IN TO THE DRYER. VICTIM TWO SHOWED ME A SMALL ABRASION ON HER LEFT SHOULDER. THIS INJURY WAS LATER PHOTOGRAPHED BY DEPUTY CLAUDE AND SUBMITTED TO EVIDENCE. VICTIM TWO STATED VICTIM ONE ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE DEFENDANT FROM HER ATTACK ON VICTIM TWO AND THE DEFENDANT SLAPPED VICTIM ONE IN THE FACE, THEN SPIT IN HIS FACE. VICTIM ONE CORROBORATED THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY VICTIM TWO. SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENTS WERE OBTAINED FROM BOTH VICTIM ONE AND VICTIM TWO DESCRIBING THE COURSE OF EVENTS AND THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANT ENTERED THE RESIDENCE UNINVITED. I ALSO MADE CONTACT WITH THE LEASER WHO WAS NOT PRESENT AT THE TIME THE ALTERCATION OCCURRED. HE ALSO STATED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD NEVER HAD PERMISSION TO BE ON OR IN HIS PROPERTY. WHILE I WAS OBTAINING THE INFORMATION FROM THE VICTIMS, A CALL WAS RECEIVED BY DISPATCH FROM THE DEFENDANT INDICATING SHE WAS AT FAT BOYS restaurant IN CRYSTAL RIVER AND CLAIMING SHE HAD BEEN ATTACKED BY THE VICTIMS. I RESPONDED TO THAT LOCATION AND WHILE EN ROUTE, LEARNED THAT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) HAD BEEN DISPATCHED. UPON ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH THE DEFENDANT WHO TOLD ME SHE WAS NINE MONTHS PREGNANT AND HAD CONTACTED EMS BECAUSE SHE FELT SHE WAS HAVING COMPLICATIONS WITH THE PREGNANCY DUE TO BEING ATTACKED BY VICTIM ONE AND VICTIM TWO. PRIOR TO BEING TRANSPORTED TO CITRUS MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, THE DEFENDANT TOLD ME THAT SHE HAD BEEN CALLED BY VICTIM ONE AND INVITED TO THE RESIDENCE. WHEN SHE ARRIVED AND WENT IN, SHE STATED SHE DISCOVERED VICTIM TWO THERE. SHE STATED VICTIM TWO PUSHED HER INTO THE DRYER, KICKED HER IN HER STOMACH AND THEN VICTIM ONE AND VICTIM TWO PUSHED HER OUT THE DOOR. THE DEFENDANT WAS THEN TRANSPORTED TO CITRUS MEMORIAL FOR TREATMENT. CONTACT WAS MADE WITH LIEUTENANT MUNDAY AND THE SITUATION WAS DESCRIBED TO HIM. HE ADVISED TO HAVE THE HOSPITAL CONTACT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE UPON THE DEFENDANT'S RELEASE AND THAT THIS AGENCY WOULD PICK HER UP, TRANSPORT HER TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, CHARGE HER WITH THE TWO COUNTS OF BURGLARY WITH BATTERY AND, DUE TO HER PREGNANCY ALMOST BEING FULL TERM, RELEASE HER ON HER OWN RECOGNIZANCE. CONTACT WAS MADE WITH VICTIM ONE WHO WAS ABLE TO SHOW ME HIS CELL PHONE WHICH SHOWED HE HAD RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE DEFENDANT AND THAT THERE WERE NO OUT-GOING CALLS TO HER. AT APPROXIMATELY 1700 HOURS, CITRUS MEMORIAL CONTACTED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, INDICATING THE DEFENDANT WAS ABOUT TO BE RELEASED. DEPUTY VENTIMIGLIA RESPONDED AND PLACED THE DEFENDANT UNDER ARREST BASED ON MY INFORMATION. DEPUTY VENTIMIGLIA THEN TRANSPORTED THE DEFENDANT TO THE DETENTION FACILITY. I MET THE DEFENDANT AT THE DETENTION FACILITY. SHE WAS READ HER MIRANDA WARNINGS VIA CARD, WHICH SHE INDICATED SHE UNDERSTOOD HER RIGHTS AND WAS WILLING TO WAIVE THEM. THE DEFENDANT AGAIN STATED IT WAS VICTIM ONE WHO HAD CALLED HER AND THAT WHEN SHE ARRIVED AT THE HOUSE, SHE WAS SURPRISED TO FIND VICTIM TWO THERE AND THAT VICTIM TWO WAS THE PRIMARY AGGRESSOR. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT AGAIN ABOUT THE PHONE CALL. AS WE WERE TALKING BACK AND FORTH, THE DEFENDANT STATED A GIRL HAD ANSWERED THE PHONE WHEN SHE CALLED VICTIM ONE. I ASKED HER THAT I THOUGHT SHE SAID VICTIM ONE HAD CALLED HER. SHE THEN CHANGED HER STORY, STATING SHE HAD CALLED VICTIM ONE AND GOTTEN INTO A VERBAL ARGUMENT WITH VICTIM TWO ON THE PHONE. THE DEFENDANT DENIED THREATENING VICTIM TWO BUT COULD NOT EXPLAIN HOW VICTIM ONE HAD INVITED HER OVER AFTER SHE HAD GOTTEN INTO AN ARGUMENT WITH VICTIM TWO. THE DEFENDANT THEN BASICALLY STOPPED ANSWERING QUESTIONS BECAUSE SHE STATED SHE DID NOT WANT TO GET IN ANY TROUBLE BECAUSE SHE WAS ON PROBATION. SHE ALSO INDICATED, AS HAD VICTIM ONE, THAT THE ONLY RELATIONSHIP SHE AND VICTIM ONE HAD HAD WAS ONE TIME WITHIN THE LAST TWO YEARS. BASED ON THAT ADMISSION, THE CASE WAS DEEMED NOT TO BE DOMESTIC. THE DEFENDANT WAS TURNED OVER TO THE DETENTION FACILITY STAFF FOR BOOKING AND PROCESSING AND THEN RELEASED ON HER OWN RECOGNIZANCE. *NOT-EXEMPT* |
