| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: MCINTYRE, HAROLD (0128) AR13-7598 DID UNLAWFULLY ENTER OR REMAIN IN A CERTAIN STRUCTURE OR CURTILAGE THEREOF, TO-WIT: 3385 SOUTH HIGHLANDS AVENUE IN INVERNESS, IN THE COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAID, THE PROPERTY OF VICTIMS, WITHOUT SAID PERSON'S CONSENT, WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THEREIN, TO-WIT: GRAND THEFT, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE 810.02(1) AND 810.02(3)(B), AND DID UNLAWFULLY AND KNOWINGLY OBTAIN, USE OR ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN OR USE THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIMS, TO-WIT: ELECTRONICS ($700.00), OF THE VALUE OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300.00) OR MORE, BUT LESS THAN FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00), WITH THE INTENT TO EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE THE VICTIMS OF THE RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFIT THEREOF, OR DID APPROPRIATE THE SAID PROPERTY TO HIS OWN USE OR THE USE OF ANY PERSON NOT ENTITLED THERETO, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTES 812.014(2)C(1). ON 041613 A RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY WAS REPORTED AT 3385 SOUTH HIGHLANDS AVENUE IN INVERNESS, FLORIDA. THE REPORT INDICATED THAT ENTRY WAS MADE BY FORCE AND APPROXIMATELY $700.00 WORTH OF ELECTRONICS WAS REMOVED FROM WITHIN. ON 093013, I DISCOVERED THAT THE DEFENDANT, MR CHARLES J HARPER, DATE OF BIRTH 092894, WAS ARRESTED ON UNRELATED CRIMINAL CHARGES AND WAS INCARCERATED AT THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY. A TRACK IT REQUEST WAS SUBMITTED REQUESTING A COMPARISON OF THE DEFENDANTâS FINGERPRINTS TO THOSE RECOVERED FROM THE CRIME SCENE ON THE AFOREMENTIONED CASE. ON 100813, I WAS CONTACTED BY MR DAVE CANNADAY OF THE CITRUS COUNTY SHERIFFâS OFFICE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. MR CANNADAY INFORMED ME VIA EMAIL THAT THE PRINTS RECOVERED FROM THE CRIME SCENE BELONGED TO THE DEFENDANT, MR CHARLES J HARPER. IT WAS A POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION PLACING MR HARPER AT THE CRIME SCENE. ON 101013, I RESPONDED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY WHERE CONTACT WAS MADE WITH THE DEFENDANT, MR CHARLES J HARPER, IN AN INTERVIEW ROOM WITHIN THE BUILDING. AFTER IDENTIFYING MYSELF AND EXPLAINING TO THE DEFENDANT MY REASONS FOR BEING THERE, HE ADVISED HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY WITHOUT A LAWYER PRESENT. THIS CONCLUDED MY INTERVIEW. THE DEFENDANT WAS RETURNED TO THE DETENTION FACILITY. THE DEFENDANT WAS CHARGED WITH ONE COUNT OF RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY UNOCCUPIED AND GRAND THEFT WITH A TOTAL BOND OF $5,000.00. |
