| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: REESE, THOMAS (AR650) THE DEFENDANT, MR CHRISTOPHER RICHARD WUNDERLICH, DID VIOLATE THE TERMS OF HIS PRE-TRAIL RELEASE, TO WIT: TRESPASSING ONTO 3266 NORTH SAILBOAT AVENUE, ON 040712, IN VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 901.15(12). ON 040712 AT APPROXIMATELY 1100 HOURS, I WAS CONTACTED BY LIEUTENANT JOHN JONES OF THE FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION (FFWC), AND WAS ADVISED THAT THE DEFENDANT, MR CHRISTOPHER RICHARD WUNDERLICH, WAS IN THE AREA OF THE CRYSTAL RIVER BUFFER PRESERVE. I WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC BATTERY, ON 040212, REFERENCE FWNC-12-OFF-1759. I WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD ALSO BEEN CHARGED WITH BOATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE AT THE SAME INSTANCE. I THEN PROCEEDED TO THE CRYSTAL RIVER YACHT CLUB. UPON MY ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH FFWC OFFICER JUSTIN HENRY, WHO ADVISED THAT HE IS FAMILIAR WITH THE DEFENDANT. OFFICER HENRY STATED THAT HE OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT GO TO HIS RESIDENCE, 3266 NORTH SAILBOAT AVENUE, WHICH IS LOCATED ON AN ISLAND DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE CRYSTAL RIVER YACHT CLUB. THIS PARTICULAR RESIDENCE IS THE SAME RESIDENCE AS THE VICTIM IN THE DOMESTIC BATTERY CHARGE FROM 040212. I THEN OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT LEAVING THE ISLAND RESIDENCE, WHICH ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE PRE-TRIAL RELEASE, WHICH HAD BEEN ISSUED ON 040312 OF THIS YEAR, WAS NOT PERMITTED ACCORDING TO SECTION 3, EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE JUDGE ORDERS PRE-TRIAL RELEASE TO BE TERMINATED, OR UNTIL THE DEFENDANTâS CASE IS DISPOSED OF. THE DEFENDANT ENTERED A BLACK IN COLOR FORD PICKUP TRUCK, AND BEGAN TO LEAVE THE AREA. HE WAS THEN STOPPED BY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP) OFFICER MATT VANN NESS, AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CHARGED FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE SUSPENDED OR REVOKED, SEE RELATED DEP CASE NUMBER, DEPC12OFF000203. THE DEFENDANT WAS THEN PLACED UNDER ARREST, HANDCUFFED AND DOUBLE LOCKED BEHIND HIS BACK, AND TRANSPORTED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY FOR BOOKING AND PROCESSING. THE DEFENDANTâS BOND WAS SET AT NO BOND, PER THE TERMS OF THE PRE-TRIAL RELEASE. AFFIANT HAS NO PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THIS CASE. |
