DISCLAIMER NOTICE: ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT...

David Samuel Pinero

Last Updated: July 19th, 2024
Jail Location
Florida
52yo
White Male

Personal Details

Date of birth: Mar 11, 1972
Probable cause affidavit: SUBMITTED BY: FAGAN, RYAN 1423 (AR16-22065/16-176358) DID UNLAWFULLY COMMIT BATTERY UPON THE VICTIM BY ACTUALLY AND INTENTIONALLY TOUCHING OR STRIKING SAID PERSON AGAINST SAID PERSON'S WILL, OR BY INTENTIONALLY CAUSING BODILY HARM, TO WIT: THE DEFENDANT PUNCHED the VICTIM IN THE FACE TWICE, and WHEN BOTH PARTIES WENT DOWN TO THE GROUND, THE DEFENDANT BIT THE VICTIM IN the ABDOMINAL AREA, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 784.03(1)(A)(1). ON 122516, AT APPROXIMATELY 2216 HOURS, I ARRIVED ON SCENE AT 8510 NORTH RONDA DRIVE IN DUNNELLON IN REFERENCE TO A BATTERY THAT HAD JUST OCCURRED. UPON ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH VICTIM, MR DANIEL LESSER, WHO STATED HE HEARD NOISES COMING FROM OUTSIDE THE RESIDENCE. HE STATED WHEN HE WENT OUTSIDE, HE SAW MR DAVID PINERO, LATER IDENTIFIED AS THE DEFENDANT, PUTTING OUTSIDE LAWN CHAIRS IN THE BACK OF HIS TRUCK. THE VICTIM STATED HE GRABBED THE SECOND CHAIR FROM THE DEFENDANT, WHERE THEY GOT INTO A VERBAL ARGUMENT. THE VICTIM STATED WHEN THEY BOTH PUT THE CHAIR DOWN, THAT WAS WHEN THE DEFENDANT PUNCHED HIM TWICE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF HIS FACE AND THAT WAS WHEN THE VICTIM TOOK THE DEFENDANT DOWN TO THE GROUND. I NOTICED A LITTLE REDNESS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE VICTIM'S FACE IN THE CHEEK AREA. THE VICTIM STATED WHILE THEY WERE ON THE GROUND, THE DEFENDANT HAD HIT HIM A FEW MORE TIMES AND THEN BIT HIM IN HIS ABDOMINAL AREA. WHILE LOOKING AT THE VICTIM, I NOTICED A CLEAR BITE MARK THAT SEEMED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WOULD BE A HUMAN BITE. I ASKED THE VICTIM HOW THE DEFENDANT WOULD HAVE BIT HIS ABDOMEN. HE STATED WHILE THEY WERE ON THE GROUND, THE VICTIM WAS ON TOP OF THE DEFENDANT TRYING TO RESTRAIN HIM UNTIL LAW ENFORCEMENT GOT ON SCENE. THE VICTIM STATED HE REALIZED THE DEFENDANT HAD BIT HIM AND CONTINUED TO STRUGGLE WITH THE DEFENDANT ON THE GROUND. THE VICTIM STATED THE DEFENDANT HAD STATED HE COULD NOT BREATHE AND THAT WAS WHEN THE VICTIM GOT OFF OF HIM. THE DEFENDANT TOOK OFF ON FOOT DOWN THE ROAD BEFORE LAW ENFORCEMENT GOT THERE. I SPOKE TO BOTH WITNESSES, MS LAURA PINERO AND MR TRAVIS LEWIS, WHO BOTH STATED THEY WITNESSED THE DEFENDANT GET INTO A CONFRONTATION WITH THE VICTIM AND WHEN THE DEFENDANT AND THE VICTIM PUT THE SECOND CHAIR DOWN, THAT WAS WHEN THE DEFENDANT PUNCHED THE VICTIM TWICE IN THE FACE AND THAT WAS WHEN THE VICTIM PUT THE DEFENDANT DOWN TO THE GROUND. THEY STATED THE VICTIM WAS ON TOP OF THE DEFENDANT TRYING TO RESTRAIN HIM. THEY ADVISED THEY DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE VICTIM BEING BIT UNTIL AFTER THE DEFENDANT HAD LEFT THE SCENE. WHILE ON SCENE, THE DEFENDANT HAD RETURNED BACK WHERE I MADE CONTACT WITH HIM. THE DEFENDANT ADVISED HE HAD COME OVER TO THE RESIDENCE TO GET THE TWO LAWN CHAIRS THAT WERE ON THE FRONT PORCH. HE STATED AS HE WAS LOADING UP THE SECOND CHAIR, THAT WAS WHEN THE VICTIM CAME OUT AND HAD GONE AFTER HIM. THE DEFENDANT STATED HE NEVER PUNCHED THE VICTIM, AND THE VICTIM HAD THROWN HIM DOWN TO THE GROUND. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT IF HE BIT THE VICTIM WHILE THEY WERE ON THE GROUND. HE STATED HE DID NOT. HE STATED IT WAS HIS DOG WHO HAD BIT THE VICTIM. AT THAT TIME, I PLACED THE DEFENDANT IN HANDCUFFS, DOUBLE-LOCKED, BEHIND HIS BACK AND PLACED HIM IN THE REAR OF MY PATROL VEHICLE UNTIL I COULD FINISH MY INVESTIGATION. AT THAT TIME, I HAD THE VICTIM AND THE TWO WITNESSES FILL OUT SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENTS. PHOTOGRAPHS WERE TAKEN OF THE VICTIM BY DEPUTY YERBURY (1244). SEE HIS CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION REPORT. I THEN ASKED THE VICTIM AGAIN HOW HE BELIEVED HE GOT THE BITE MARK. HE STATED WHILE THEY WERE ON THE GROUND, AND HE WAS ON TOP OF THE DEFENDANT, THAT WAS WHEN HE BELIEVED THE DEFENDANT BIT HIM. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT ONE MORE TIME IF HE HAD BIT THE VICTIM. HE CONTINUED TO STATE HE BELIEVED HIS DOG BIT HIM. AT THAT TIME, I DETERMINED THE DEFENDANT WAS THE PRIMARY AGGRESSOR BETWEEN WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE EVIDENCE SHOWING INJURY. I ADVISED THE DEFENDANT HE WAS BEING PLACED UNDER ARREST AND BEING CHARGED WITH SIMPLE BATTERY. THE DEFENDANT WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY WHERE HE WAS TURNED OVER TO STAFF FOR BOOKING AND PROCESSING. THE DEFENDANT WAS CHARGED WITH ONE COUNT OF SIMPLE BATTERY WITH A BOND SET AT $1,000.00, PER THE BOND SCHEDULE. ALL PAPERWORK WAS TURNED IN TO RECORDS. NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN BY THIS DEPUTY.
Inmate name: DAVID SAMUEL PINERO
Account balance: ($0.00)
Inmate status: Misdemeanor

Known addresses

2937 E Bryant St, Florida 34453
Exempt, Florida 34465
Exempt, Florida 34450

Recent Arrests

Arrest number: 22065
Arrest date: Dec 25, 2016
Arrest type: Misdemeanor
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Arrest number: 18543
Arrest date: Mar 7, 2016
Arrest type: Misdemeanor
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Arrest date: Jul 8, 2012
Booking number: 1881
Booking location: Citrus County, FL

Arrest date: Sep 6, 2004
Arrest officer: Seminole County Sheriff`s Office
Booking number: 200400012501
Booking location: Seminole County, FL

Recent Charges

Code: 784.03(1)(A)(1)
Charge description: Battery
Bond amount: $1,000

Description: DUI

Code: 741.31(4)(A)
Charge description: Violate Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence
Bond amount: $0

Code: 784.03(1)(A)(1) - Domestic
Charge description: Domestic Battery
Bond amount: $0

ACTIVELY MONITORING...

Disclaimer:
Information available through Rain-Street.com is provided for informational purposes only. All records are subject to change and, while every effort is made to ensure the information available is current and accurate, it may contain errors. No guarantee can be made with regard to the accuracy, currency, completeness or usefulness of any information available through this website.

Records published on this website are in no way an indication of guilt or evidence that a crime was committed. Every person mentioned on this website is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Arrest and other court records do not imply guilt. Criminal charges are only formal allegations. For complete case records, contact the relevant law enforcement or judicial agency.