| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: LAUGHLIN, JEREMY 0617 (AR12-2726) DID UNLAWFULLY ENTER OR REMAIN IN A CERTAIN CONVEYANCE, TO-WIT: A 2003 WHITE TRUCK BEARING TAG NUMBER GBY122, THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM, WITHOUT SAID PERSON'S CONSENT, WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THEREIN, TO-WIT: GRAND THEFT, AND THE SAID CONVEYANCE WAS NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AT THE TIME, AND THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT LICENSED OR INVITED TO ENTER OR REMAIN IN SAID CONVEYANCE, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE 810.02; AND DID UNLAWFULLY ENTER OR REMAIN IN A CERTAIN CONVEYANCE, TO-WIT: A 2005 WHITE TRUCK BEARING TAG NUMBER GBY234, THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM, WITHOUT SAID PERSON'S CONSENT, WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THEREIN, TO-WIT: GRAND THEFT, AND THE SAID CONVEYANCE WAS NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AT THE TIME, AND THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT LICENSED OR INVITED TO ENTER OR REMAIN IN SAID CONVEYANCE, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE 810.02; AND DID UNLAWFULLY AND KNOWINGLY OBTAIN, USE OR ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN OR USE THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM, TO-WIT: $400.00 WORTH OF CHIPS AND DIP, OF THE VALUE OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300.00) OR MORE, BUT LESS THAN TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00), WITH THE INTENT TO EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE THE VICTIM OF A RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFIT THEREOF, OR DID APPROPRIATE THE SAID PROPERTY TO HIS OWN USE OR THE USE OF ANY PERSON NOT ENTITLED THERETO, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTES 812.014. ON 081012, THE VICTIM ADVISED THAT TWO VEHICLES HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO AT HIS FRITO LAY WAREHOUSE LOCATED IN HERNANDO FLORIDA. THE VICTIM ADVISED APPROXIMATELY 10 CASES OF MISCELLANEOUS CHIPS AND DIPS HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLES AND ESTIMATED THE TOTAL LOSS TO BE APPROXIMATELY $400.00. DURING THIS TIME, DEPUTY VICK PROCESSED THE SCENE AND COLLECTED SEVERAL FINGERPRINTS. ON 091112, THIS DETECTIVE WAS INFORMED BY CRIME SCENE TECHNICIAN DAVE CANNADAY THAT A PRINT LIFTED BY DEPUTY VICK FROM THE INCIDENT HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ROBBIE ALLEN SANDERSâ WITH A DATE OF BIRTH OF 040585. THIS DETECTIVE THEN MADE CONTACT WITH THE VICTIM TO INQUIRE IF MR SANDERS HAD EVER WORKED FOR THE VICTIM OR HAD ACCESS TO THE VEHICLES THAT HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO. THE VICTIM ADVISED HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF MR ROBBIE ALLEN SANDERS AND THAT ONLY A FEW INDIVIDUALS HAD ACCESS TO THE TRUCKS THAT HAD BEEN BURGLARIZED. ON 091212, CONTACT WAS MADE WITH MR ROBBIE SANDERS. IN SPEAKING WITH MR SANDERS I ADVISED HIM THAT I WAS INVESTIGATING A CASE IN WHICH TWO FRITO LAY TRUCKS HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO AND PROPERTY HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLES WITH A VALUE OF APPROXIMATELY $400.00. MR SANDERS EXPLAINED THAT HE DOES VISIT THE FRITO LAY WAREHOUSE FROM TIME TO TIME AND DOES REMOVE EXPIRED FOOD WHICH THE FRITO LAY WAREHOUSE HAS DISCARDED IN THE TRASH. I AGAIN ADVISED MR SANDERS THAT PROPERTY HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLES NEXT TO THE WAREHOUSE AND NOT THE DUMPSTER AND THAT HE NEEDED TO BE HONEST ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT. MR SANDERS THEN ADVISED THAT HE HAD INDEED BROKEN INTO THE VEHICLE DUE TO BEING DOWN ON HIS LUCK AND NEEDING MONEY TO PAY BILLS. MR SANDERS WAS REMORSEFUL AND WISHED TO CONTACT THE VICTIM IN ORDER TO ATTEMPT TO RIGHT HIS WRONG. THIS DETECTIVE THEN ASKED MR SANDERS IF HE WOULD AGREE TO MEET THIS DETECTIVE ON 091312, AT OPERATIONS IN ORDER TO GIVE A STATEMENT. MR SANDERS AGREED AND WAS RELEASED AT THE SCENE. ON 091312 AT APPROXIMATELY 1000 HOURS, CONTACT WAS AGAIN MADE WITH MR SANDERS AS HE RESPONDED TO THE SHERIFFâS OFFICE OPERATIONS. MR SANDERS WAS THEN READ MIRANDA VIA AN AGENCY PREPRINTED CARD. THIS WAS RECORDED VIA VIDEO AND AUDIO. MR SANDERS AGAIN ADVISED THAT HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BURGLARIES TO THE FRITO LAY TRUCKS ON 080912. HE ADVISED HE HAD REMOVED NUMEROUS CASES OF CHIPS AND DIP AND THEN HAD SOLD THEM AT THE FLEA MARKET THAT SATURDAY AND SUNDAY IN MARION COUNTY. MR SANDERS ADVISED THAT HE HAD ONLY COMMITTED THE CRIME BECAUSE HE NEEDED TO PAY AN ELECTRIC BILL AND THAT HE HAD NEVER COMMITTED ANY CRIMES LIKE THIS BEFORE. MR SANDERS EXPRESSED REGRET AND ADVISED HE WAS ONLY DOING IT TO TRY TO SUPPORT HIS FAMILY. MR SANDERS DID FILL OUT A SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT, WHICH CORROBORATED HIS VERBAL STATEMENTS. THE INTERVIEW WAS RECORDED VIA CLOSED CIRCUIT VIDEO AND A DVD WAS COPIED AND WILL BE TURNED IN TO EVIDENCE. MR SANDERS SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT WAS COLLECTED AND WILL BE TURNED IN TO RECORDS. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE INTERVIEW MR SANDERS WAS PLACED UNDER ARREST AND TRANSPORTED TO THE DETENTION FACILITY FOR BOOKING AND PROCESSING FOR TWO COUNTS OF BURGLARY AND ONE COUNT OF GRAND THEFT. DUE TO MR SANDERS COOPERATION AND REMORSE HE WAS RELEASED ON HIS OWN RECOGNIZANCE (ROR) ON HIS CHARGES. |
