| Probable cause affidavit: |
SUBMITTED BY: YERBURY, CHAD 1244 (13-84853) (AR13-6219) DID UNLAWFULLY ENTER OR REMAIN IN A CERTAIN STRUCTURE OR CURTILAGE THEREOF, TO-WIT: RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 6445 NORTH WAVE POINT, HERNANDO, IN THE COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAID, THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM, WITHOUT SAID PERSON'S CONSENT, WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THEREIN, TO-WIT: PETIT THEFT, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE 810.02(3)(B). DID UNLAWFULLY AND KNOWINGLY OBTAIN OR USE, OR ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN OR USE THE PROPERTY OF THE VICTIM TO WIT: PLAYSTATION, CONTROLLERS AND WIRES, SAID PROPERTY BEING OF A VALUE OF $150.00 WITH THE INTENT TO EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE THE VICTIM OF A RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFIT THEREOF, OR DID APPROPRIATE THE SAID PROPERTY TO HER OWN USE OR THE USE OF ANY PERSON NOT ENTITLED THERETO, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 812.014(3)(A). ON 062513 AT APPROXIMATELY 1730 HOURS, I WAS DISPATCH TO 6445 NORTH WAVE POINT, HERNANDO IN REFERENCE TO A THEFT THAT HAD ALREADY OCCURRED WHICH WAS LATER DETERMINED TO ALSO BE A BURGLARY. UPON ARRIVAL, I MADE CONTACT WITH THE VICTIM, MR TRAVIS REED, WHO STATED THAT AT APPROXIMATELY 1300 HOURS WHILE HE WAS AT WORK, HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND/DEFENDANT, MS SASHA TAFLINGER, HAD COME TO HIS PROPERTY IN A SUSPICIOUS MANOR, SNOOPED AROUND HIS WHITE PICKUP TRUCK IN THE DRIVEWAY AND HIS BLUE TOYOTA PICKUP TRUCK WHICH WAS PARKED IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN ENTERED THROUGH THE REAR SLIDING DOOR, WHICH WAS LOCKED. THE VICTIM EXPLAINED THAT HE DID NOT WITNESS THIS HIMSELF, HOWEVER HIS NEIGHBOR FROM 6446 NORTH WAVE POINT, HERNANDO, WITNESS, MS ERIN NELSON, OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT SUSPICIOUSLY WALK AROUND THE PROPERTY AND LOOK IN THE VICTIMâS WHITE PICKUP TRUCK AND BLUE PICKUP TRUCK AND THEN DISAPPEAR FROM HER VIEW BEHIND THE RESIDENCE FOR APPROXIMATELY 10-15 MINUTES. THE VICTIM STATED THAT HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND HAS BEEN ORDERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NOT TO BE ON THE PREMISES, WITHOUT CONSENT AND SUPERVISION. ACCORDING TO THE VICTIM, THE DEFENDANT HAD MOVED OUT APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS AGO. THE VICTIM STATED THAT HE KEEPS HIS RESIDENCE LOCKED AND THAT THE DEFENDANT IS WELL AWARE OF HOW TO ENTER THE RESIDENCE BY PUSHING IN ON THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND SHAKING IT UNTIL THE INTERIOR LOCKING PIN SLIDES OUT. THE VICTIM STATED THAT HE BELIEVES THE DEFENDANT HAD TAKEN A BLACK PLAYSTATION INCLUDING TWO CONTROLLERS AND THE WIRES FOR THE PLAYSTATION. THE VICTIM STATED THAT HE AND THE DEFENDANT WERE NEVER MARRIED, HOWEVER, THEY DO HAVE TWO CHILDREN TOGETHER THAT HE HAS TAKEN FULL CUSTODY OF DUE TO HER TESTING POSITIVE FOR DRUGS. THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES HAD ORDERED SUPERVISED VISITS ONLY AND FOR THE DEFENDANT TO VACATE THE PREMISES. THE VICTIM STATED HE DID NOT INVITE HER TO COME TO THE PROPERTY AND HE HAS WARNED HER NOT TO GO THERE WHEN HE IS NOT HOME AND THAT HE DOES NOT WANT HER THERE. HE STATED THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY OTHER SUSPECTS AND BELIEVES THAT SHE WOULD TAKE THE PLAYSTATION TO PAWN. HE STATED THAT SHE DOES HAVE SOME CLOTHING THERE, BUT IS ONLY ALLOWED TO GO TO GET CLOTHING WITH SUPERVISION AND PERMISSION. THE VICTIM STATED THAT THERE IS AN INJUNCTION PREVENTING HER FROM BEING ON THE PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION AND SUPERVISION. I OBSERVED THE BACK SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND THE MANOR IN WHICH HE LOCKS IT, BY AN INTERIOR SLIDING PIN. I OBSERVED NO DAMAGE TO THE DOOR OR LOCKING MECHANISM, NOR DID I NOTICE ANY OTHER DAMAGE TO ANY OTHER POSSIBLE POINT OF ENTRY AROUND THE RESIDENCE. I OBSERVED THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR GLASS TO BE EXTREMELY DIRTY WITH MULTIPLE SMUDGES AND DIRT. THE VICTIM STATED THAT HE, THE KIDS, AND THE DEFENDANT WOULD USE THE GLASS TO OPEN AND CLOSE THE DOOR. SEE CRIME SCENE TECHNICIAN REPORT. THE VICTIM SHOWED ME WHERE THE PLAYSTATION HAD SAT IN HIS DAUGHTERâS ROOM NEAR A SMALL TELEVISION ON A SHELF. HIS DAUGHTER STATED THAT IT HAD SAT UPRIGHT LIKE A TOWER ON THAT SHELF. NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE TELEVISION OR THE WALL. THE VICTIM STATED AT THIS TIME HE DID NOT NOTICE ANYTHING ELSE MISSING. THE VICTIM COMPLETED A SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT. I MET WITH THE WITNESS, MS ERIN NELSON, AT 6446 NORTH WAVE POINT, HERNANDO, WHO STATED THAT AT APPROXIMATELY 1300 HOURS, SHE WITNESSED THE DEFENDANT SUSPICIOUSLY WALK HER NEIGHBOR/VICTIMâS PROPERTY, LOOKING INTO THE WHITE PICKUP TRUCK IN THE DRIVEWAY AND THE BLUE PICKUP IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN DISAPPEAR FOR 10-15 MINUTES AROUND THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. THE WITNESS STATED THAT WHEN THE DEFENDANT ARRIVED ON THE PROPERTY, SHE DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING IN HER HANDS, HOWEVER, WHEN SHE LEFT THE PROPERTY, HER ARMS WERE FULL WITH ITEMS SHE COULD NOT IDENTIFY. THE WITNESS STATED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD MOVED OUT APPROXIMATELY 3-4 WEEKS AGO, NOT SURE OF EXACT DATE. ALTHOUGH SHE DID NOT KNOW THE DETAILS, SHE KNEW THAT IT HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND THE DEFENDANTâS DRUG ACTIVITY. THE WITNESS ADVISED ME THAT SHE DOES HAVE A SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ON HER RESIDENCE AND THAT SHE HAD FOOTAGE FOR ME TO OBSERVE. I ENTERED THE WITNESSâS RESIDENCE AT APPROXIMATELY 1810 HOURS AND OBSERVED A VIDEO WHICH WAS TIME STAMPED AT 1159 HOURS AND COMPLETED AT 1214 HOURS ON 062513. THE WITNESS STATED THAT THE TIME STAMP ON HER MACHINE IS OFF BY APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR. I OBSERVED THE VIDEO FOOTAGE OF WHAT APPEARED TO BE THE DEFENDANT WALKING AROUND THE VICTIMâS PROPERTY IN A SUSPICIOUS MANOR WITH NOTHING IN HER HANDS, LOOKING INTO THE BACK OF THE WHITE PICKUP TRUCK IN THE DRIVEWAY, GOING TO THE BLUE PICKUP TRUCK ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY AND LOOKING INSIDE OF IT AND THEN DISAPPEAR FROM VIEW BEHIND THE RESIDENCE. WHEN THE DEFENDANT RE-APPEARED, AS SHE WAS LEAVING THE PROPERTY, I OBSERVED HER HAVING MULTIPLE ITEMS IN HER HANDS WHICH WERE INDISCERNIBLE FROM THE DISTANCE. THE WITNESS STATED THAT SHE DID NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF MAKING A COPY OF THE FOOTAGE, HOWEVER WOULD BE WILLING TO DOWN LOAD IT TO A THUMB DRIVE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND CONTACT US TO COLLECT THE EVIDENCE. SHE FURTHER STATED THAT THE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE WOULD BE SAFE AND STAYS ON HER MACHINE FOR UP TO 90 DAYS. THE WITNESS PROVIDED A SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT. AS I WAS PREPARING TO DEPART, THE VICTIM HANDED ME HIS CELLULAR TELEPHONE ADVISING ME THAT IT WAS THE DEFENDANT AT APPROXIMATELY 1827 HOURS. I ASKED THE DEFENDANT IF SHE WOULD BE WILLING TO MEET WITH ME AND COMPLETE A STATEMENT EXPLAINING HER REASONS FOR BEING AT THE RESIDENCE, TO WHICH SHE AGREED. I MADE CONTACT WITH THE DEFENDANT AT 6870 NORTH CAPRI LOOP, HERNANDO. THE DEFENDANT STATED THAT AT APPROXIMATELY 1300 HOURS ON 062513, SHE DID GO TO HER BOYFRIENDâS RESIDENCE AT 6446 NORTH WAVE POINT, HERNANDO, TO GET SOME CLOTHING THAT SHE HAD LEFT THERE. THE DEFENDANT STATED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND THE VICTIM HAD MADE HER LEAVE HER RESIDENCE APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS AGO AFTER AN INJUNCTION WAS PUT IN PLACE DUE TO HER TESTING POSITIVE FOR NARCOTICS. SHE STATED THAT SHE IS SUPPOSED TO CALL AND MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HER BOYFRIEND AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN ORDER TO SEE HER CHILDREN FOR SUPERVISED VISITS. WITH THIS IN MIND, SHE KNEW SHE WAS NOT ALLOWED AT THE RESIDENCE UNSUPERVISED, HOWEVER, CHOSE TO GO THERE ANYWAY. SHE STATED THAT SHE DID NOT TAKE THE VIDEO GAME, BUT JUST COLLECTED HER CLOTHING AND STATED THAT SHE DID NOT ENTER THE RESIDENCE. THE DEFENDANT PROVIDED ME WITH A SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT. ALL WRITTEN STATEMENTS WERE COLLECTED AND TURNED IN TO RECORDS. I PROVIDED THE VICTIM WITH AN AGENCY ISSUED CASE CARD BEARING THIS CASE NUMBER AND MY IDENTIFICATION AND ADVISED THE VICTIM TO CONTACT THIS AGENCY WITH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS CASE. THE DEFENDANT WAS PLACED UNDER ARREST, HANDCUFFED, BEHIND HER BACK, (DOUBLE LOCKED), SECURED IN THE REAR OF MY PATROL VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTED TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY FOR BOOKING AND PROCESSING. WHILE EN ROUTE TO THE CITRUS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY THE VICTIM CONTACTED ME AND ADVISED THAT HE HAD BEEN IN CONTACT WITH MS DANIELLE WILDER WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, TELEPHONE NUMBER 352-302-2059. MS WILDER HAD VISITED THE VICTIM AFTER I LEFT THE RESIDENCE. THE VICTIM FURTHER CONFIRMED WITH MS WILDER THAT THE DEFENDANT IS NOT TO BE AT THE RESIDENCE WITHOUT SUPERVISION. THE VICTIM ALSO INFORMED ME THAT HE KNEW THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD BEEN IN THE RESIDENCE AS SOME ITEMS HAD BEEN MOVED AND THE RADIO HAD BEEN TURNED ON. I ATTEMPTED TO MAKE CONTACT WITH MS WILDER VIA CELLULAR TELEPHONE, WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THE DEFENDANTâS BOND WAS SET AT A TOTAL $3,250.00, PER THE BOND SCHEDULE. |
